NATURAL OR NEGATION

NATURAL OR NEGATION? Is anything legally binding? From my studies I have concluded that literally nothing is legally binding to, nor upon a species of lawless folks; those who lack moral consistency or virtuous character. Back of law is respect for righteousness. Where righteousness is disrespected in persons, institutions, nations, any laws that are promulgated are mere pretexts; so too are treaties, contracts, constitutions. Thus, one can exclude man-from-man by "race" without the slightest of ennui. One can write one thing, promise to do that thing, yet purposefully, deceitfully do the exact opposite, without any remorse. Lastly one can lie to the point of derision; yes lie,lie, lie, again and again, without compunction! Unless a book's binding is secured by diligence, its pages will fall apart to dirt. Man, too, must be bound as is a book, whose binding is natural philosophy, is based upon, ratified by nature, heaven and earth; or recognized as negations of nature, heaven and earth in all things