Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Revolutions transcend science


The invention of other new theories regularly, and appropriately, evokes the same response from some of the specialists on whose areas of special competence they impinge. For these men the new theory implies a change in the rules governing the prior practice of normal science. Inevitably, therefore, it reflects on much scientific work they have already completed. That is why a new theory, however special its range of application, is seldom or never just an increment to what is already known. Its assimilation requires the reconstruction of prior theory and the re-evaluation of prior fact, an intrinsically revolutionary process that is seldom completed by a single man and never overnight. No wonder historians have difficulty in dating precisely this extended process that their vocabulary impels them to view as an isolated event.”



THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS, by Thomas S. Kuhn, p.7, introduction by Ian Hacking (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London: 2012)



Both Jesus Christ and Martin Luther King, Jr. are revolutionaries within the putative scientific class described above.