Tuesday, September 18, 2012

“SQUARE”: SOCIOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE NON- “HIP” SOCIAL REJECT


“SQUARE”: SOCIOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE NON- “HIP” SOCIAL REJECT

09/18/12

By Rev. Dr. Larry Delano Coleman



Back in the 1950's and 1960's, to be called a “square” was considered to be an insult.



“Hip” was the thing to be! “Hip” enabled admission into, and retention inside of, “the in-crowd:” a song and an idiom popularized by Dobie Gray, a popular “soul” singer of that era.



A definition of a “square” was never, however, precisely articulated by its endorsers or its traducers. Neither was its provenance nor its origin entirely certain. By inference and implication, its definition was deduced to be the opposite of “hip,” whatever that happened to be, as it was also being undefined.



“Hip” and “square” were both overarching, black cultural memes in that era, however. They continue to accrete: culturally, sociologically, pedagogically, still essentially undefined, until now.



For example, “Detroit Red,” Malcolm Little a/k/a Malcolm X a/k/a El Hajj Malik-El Shabazz got his hair “conked,” processed, chemically straightened, to avoid being “square” in the 1940's. He also began to wear zoot suits; to steal and burglarize homes and businesses in order to be deemed a hustler, with money to flash and women to sport. Prison, his brother Reginald's love, and his initiation of his self-help reading program in the dictionary and other works began him on a trail of rehabilitation. While he was on this path, he was converted to the Nation of Islam, lead by the Honorable Elijah Muhammad.



Malcolm X's Boston-based, “Detroit Red” cultural caricature of black manhood stands in stark contrast to this Omaha, Nebraska, native's former straight-A high school background. It also vilifies his father, a Baptist preacher, murdered by racist whites for espousing the philosophy of Marcus Mosiah Garvey. Malcolm's archetypal story is brilliantly set forth in The Autobiography of Malcolm X by Alex Haley.



In an effort to remain “hip” several well-known musicians pursued self-destructive lifestyles, which culminated in death from overdosing on drugs or alcohol, or from complications associated therewith. Prominent among them were Charlie “Yardbird” Parker and Billie “Lady-day” Holliday both prominent in the 1930's and 1940's. Homicides afflicted Sam Cooke and Marvin Gaye in the 1960's and 1970's. Tupac Shakur, Biggie Smalls and others, all homicides, followed in the 1980's through 2000's.



Whatever “hip” may be, however defined, its sequel is too often tragedy.



It is also virulently contagious. It took root and spread rapidly in the North as well as in the South in rural areas, suburban areas, and in urban areas. In this context, the cultural hegira of blacks from the South to the North in the late 1870's and continuing in surging waves through the 1950's, in search of economic opportunity and educational parity, played a key role in this “hip” vs. “square” dichotomy.



Those rural migrants were branded as “square” by their pseudo-urbane brothers and sisters, who were themselves “fresh from the country,” give or take a generation. Rather than to be teased or ostracized socially, these new emigrants assumed the lingo, lifestyles and values of their “hip” northern kindred.



Thus core family values imported from the South like religion, education, discipline, and hard work slowly dissipated. These core values enabled these rural emigrants to survive white-hate oppression and discrimination of the post-Reconstruction South. There official and unofficial white terrorism was overt and open, a way of life and legal! In the North, it was covert and disguised, dissembled behind platitudes about freedom and equal opportunity. Yet, the police and courts were just as bad, effectively.



Relaxing their grip once they arrived in the North, some families were dissolved by the acid of “hip,” dissolute lifestyles, in which: education was not valued; religion was “old-fashioned;” discipline was either totally absent or wantonly abused; hard work—any work—was lacking, and families dissolved.



Meanwhile, the “squares,” went to church, finished high school or college, got married and raised families; disciplined their children and worked hard, sometimes working 2 or more jobs to preserve their families. “Squares” also tended to avoid jail and early graves brought on by dissolute lifestyles.



This “hip”/ “square” over-generalization continues to be this day over 140 years since the Black Exodus from the South began in 1879. This dichotomy manifests in many evils. Among them is black-on-black crime, extremely high abortion rates, incarceration ratios that lead the world, unenviable education deficits, religions that conform rather than transform, unemployment and underemployment and an unreasonable expectation that the government will save them, somehow.



Black troops saved the government, the Union, from utter destruction in the Civil War! Remember? Therefore, how can government, the anomalous salvee, possibly save blacks, the anomalous salvor, from themselves, from their own “hip” lifestyle choices? What was once “hip,” has now “hopped,” across the racial divide and even across national divides, becoming globally known now as “hip-hop.”



Governments can and must help. As they now and have historically helped banks, investors, farmers, industry, unions, non-profit by domestic, tax and fiscal policies. It must do likewise for those it was once subjugated, terrorized and oppressed. But governments cannot save! Only people can save themselves.



Once people squarely face and squarely accept self-responsibility, things will change for the better for themselves Until then, not!



Geometrically, a “square” is a parallelogram with 4 right angles and 4 equal sides. A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two pairs of parallel sides. Parallel lines are lines in the same plane that never intersect. A quadrilateral is a polygon with 4 sides. A polygon is a closed two-dimensional figure with 3 or more sides. A right angle is an angle that has a measure of 90 degrees. “Squaring” a number is when that number is multiplied by itself. Example: 7 x 7 = 49; 10 x 10 = 100. (Note: all definitions used in this paragraph are taken from Math-E-Magic: 169 Astonishing Numerical Challenges, by Raymond Blum, Adam Hart-Davis, Bob Longe, and Derrick Niederman, “Glossary,” (Sterling Innovation, an imprint of Sterling Publishing Co., Inc. New York/London: 2010)).



A “square” is complete and self contained, comprising 360 degrees, unlike its more “hip” triangle kindred which only comprises 180 degrees! Thus, any square contains any two triangles. Or, put esoterically, even in a “right” triangle, the area of the hypotenuese is equal to the combined areas of the squares of its other two sides triangular sides. Hence, a2 + b2 = c2 otherwise known as the Pythagorean theorem obtains. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras%27_theorem.



So, “squares” of the world, look up! Colloquially, a square deal is a fair deal. Nutritionally, a square meal is a balanced meal. Since, “square” connotes balance, fairness, and “right,” “Hip,” its opposite, necessarily connotes imbalance, unfairness and wrong. You're twice the better of your “hip” cousins!



#30