Sunday, March 29, 2009
Fulfilling My Reason for Being
When I was in high school, in St. Louis County, Missouri, in the 1960‘s, certain female friends called me, what sounded like, “Diddy.” Confused by the sobriquet, and uncertain as to its meaning, I asked what they were saying, and, why? They were mum. Years later, one of them told me they were saying “Deity,” viz., “Deity Coleman.”
Naturally, I was confused. How could they infer anything like that about me--one who was quite skeptical about all things religious at that time? And one who sensed no divinity in himself, whatsoever. Sure, I was a founder of the black students’ organization, well read, reasonably smart, and readily acknowledged to be a student leader. But, “deity”? That was way over-the-top even viewed retrospectively.
Later, much later, I learned there is, necessarily, divinity in us all. And divinity in all-- continuously and uninterruptedly. Eternally.
This conception germinated slowly within my consciousness, over time, gaining sustenance from many sources, in many ways. The teachings of Jesus Christ became the crystalline epicenter of them all, after having thrice been delivered from death by his grace and mercy.
He taught me far more than I could ever “know” about myself, my God and my context. He still teaches all who earnestly seek to know. Jesus heals and fulfills. Christ healed and fulfilled me. Providing living water that slaked and quenched my thirst for understanding.
His declaration in John 14:12 assured and encouraged me. “Verily, verily I say unto you, he that believeth on me , the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.” Belief and work. Belief in his work. Believe.
This apprehension, this realization came to permeate my entire consciousness. It empowered me. It edified me. It emboldened me. It also wounded and convicted me, impelling study and activity, while emasculating all excuses. To know and believe is to do and achieve, necessarily, world without end. Amen. Matt.28:20.
But, no one goes joyfully to Golgotha, not even the Savior, the exemplar of us all. Mark 14:36: “And He was saying, Abba! Father! All things are possible for You; remove this cup from Me; yet not what I will, but what You will."
Thus, I fled away from my mandate. In doing so, I emulated Jonah, Elijah, and Paul, nee Saul, and many of you. Now, spent, cornered and cowering, I surrender to his will. “Touch me, Lord Jesus!”
In Jonah 1:2, we find where God orders Jonah to: “Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it; for their wickedness is come up before me.” Instead, Jonah attempts to flee the command of God by sailing to Tarshish, by way of Joppa. This precipitated near-disastrous consequences for Jonah and the sailors. In a fierce storm, the crew threw him into the sea, reluctantly, as an act of expiation.
God’s whale swallowed Jonah whole. And, after 3 days, the whale vomited him, safely, in Nineveh. Here, Jonah would, now, gladly cry against Ninevah, as God had originally ordered.
Similarly, Elijah, the mighty prophet of God, after defeating, then slaughtering, the 450 priests of Baal in 1 Kings 18:20-40, flees in terror for his life when their sovereign, Queen Jezebel, threatens retaliatory vengeance upon Elijah, himself, in 1 Kings 19:2-4:
2Then Jezebel sent a messenger unto Elijah, saying, So let the gods do to me, and more also, if I make not thy life as the life of one of them by to morrow about this time.
3And when he saw that, he arose, and went for his life, and came to Beersheba, which belongeth to Judah, and left his servant there.
4But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.
The Lord saved Elijah. But, rebuked this prophet’s claim of presumptive uniqueness, noting there remained 7,000 other prophets whose knees had not bowed to Baal and whose lips had not kissed him. 1 Kings 19:18
Elijah, who met God in the mouth of a cave at Mount Horeb, obeyed God’s command to return on his way to the wilderness of Damascus, and to anoint Hazael, Jehu, and Elisha, enroute. 1 Kings 19:15-17
The Apostle Paul, as is well known, was not always an “apostle.” Acts 8:1-3; 9:2. Neither, was he always “Paul.” Only after meeting Jesus on the Damascus Road and being converted, did Saul become Paul, only then did the former persercutor, Gal. 1:23, become the Lord’s preacher and apostle. Acts 9:1-31.
Jonah was already a good man. Adversity made him a better man. Elijah had already out-dueled, then slew, the priests of Baal. Yet, he feared and fled from Jezebel unto Mount Horeb. Saul was a destroyer of the followers of Christ. But the Damascus road flipped his script. Paul surrendered. Elijah surrendered. Jonah surrendered. In the end, we all surrender. Because, in the end we surrender all to its source!
I, too, am a good man. But, whom the Lord loves, he prunes that they may bear more fruit. John 15:2. And so it was on July 20, 2010, he “flipped my script:” purged me, by striking me with a stroke on the left side of my body. In that instant, my purpose in life became clear. He has enabled me by disabling me, so I may perfectly pursue his ministry. He has emboldened me by withholding from me my lucrative legal legacy. I chose. But God disposed.
Over the years, I have attempted and studied many things. Yet, my efforts have, somehow, all fallen short of my expectations. I’ve been constrained to look inward, to retrace my steps to more sapient and satisfying moments. All of these have involved organizing, teaching, writing, and/or implementing some spiritually-derived stratagem for change, in society enabling greater good and inducing greater love.
The Bible says in Romans 4:17--
As it is written, "I have made you the father of many nations." Abraham acted in faith when he stood in the presence of God, who gives life to the dead and calls into existence things that don't yet exist.
I have been called by God from the womb, from the moment I breached the matrix. My high school friends saw the call of God upon me. They saw an unfolding anointing, which I could not see.
Romans 8:28 says
And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.
In the black church, being “called” is good stuff. The scripture, Romans 8:29-30, equates the “call” with both predestination and justification.
29For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.
Predestination is more than inevitability and justification is more than forgiveness, in this context. That is because God’s grace is the context. God’s foreknowledge is itself grace, and forgiveness.
But all cannot hear, or will not heed, that “still small voice.” 1 Kings 19:12. To be conformed to the likeness of Jesus Christ is the final consummation of glory.
And if one does not “hear” God’s call upon one’s own life, one may still be blessed by simply calling on God. Romans 10:13-17 explains:
13For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
14How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
15And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
16But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
17So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Hearing is one thing. Heeding what has been heard is quite another, as Jonah’s example teaches. Faith is fundamental. Hebrews 11:6:
And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.
“Heeding” is obedience. Allowing God’s will to be done through you is complete obedience, a difficult task. Even Christ decried the bitter cup, which he was called to consume: crucifixion and resurrection.
Even so, there is a reward for obedience that is at once temporal and eternal. Mark 10: 29-31 is reassuring.
29And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's,
30But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.
31But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.
Another reward is one’s ability to “call” things into being as though they were, through God’s grace. Mark 11:23-24 instructs:
For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith. Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye shall have them.
The mantra “Perceive, Believe, Receive” commends itself to this precept. “Whosoever,” means anyone, “sinner” or “saved” or someone in between. All have this same power to call things into being as though they were, if they do not doubt in their hearts.
“Doubt” disables, disarms, destroys and devastates man, internally. Doubt, in short, dissipates belief, which undermines faith, which separates and isolates the created from the creator, man from God, which deprives man of access to divine knowledge, wisdom, power.
In 1916, Rev. Charles A. Tindley wrote the hymn “Leave it There.” Apropos to the issue of doubt is this line: “If you trust and never doubt, he will surely bring you. Take your burden to the Lord and leave them there.” http://nethymnal.org/htm/l/e/leaveitt.htm
Daniel, a “dissolver of doubts,” Daniel 5:12, 16, was commended to King Belshazzar of Babylon, by his queen, to interpret the mysterious handwriting on the wall which so greatly troubled the king that “the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote against one another.” (Dan.5:6) None of the king’s astrologers, soothsayers, or wise men could read the writing, nor interpret it to the king. But, Daniel could and did, (Dan. 5:25-29), by and through God‘s grace. (Dan.2:19-23) The queen’s confidence in Daniel was based upon his singularly successful interpretation of King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream.
Lorraine Hansberry, the great African American playwright, author of “Raisin in the Sun” and “The Drinking Gourd,” among other works, resolved “I am a writer, and I am going to write.” Such synchronicity between one’s self awareness and one’s self-actualization; between one’s true reason for being and one’s life’s work; and between one’s predestined purpose and one’s passionate pursuit, is divinity, itself.
Writing, for “Sweet Lorraine” Hansberry, as for me, is “thy first love,” referenced in Revelations 2:4. It is “the first works,” which one must “do,” after repentance and remembrance of past failings. Rev. 2:6. “Write the vision and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.” Habakkuk 2:2-3
“Failings,” of course, is relative. One may appear to succeed and yet fail. One may appear to fail and yet succeed. Jesus Christ is a prime example of one who appeared to fail--the crucifixion--and who yet succeeded, the resurrection. Judas, on the other hand, appeared to succeed, receiving earthly reward, the symbolic pieces of silver, and also universal opprobrium and eternal damnation.
One, indeed, may display good works, patience, faithfulness, multiple virtues and multiple attributes, and still come up short in God’s sight. A good example is “the rich young man” who inquired, “Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?” Jesus admonished him “to keep the commandments.” The young man rejoined, “All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet?“ Matthew 19:20. Jesus told him to “Go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shall have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.” He sorrowfully declined this earthly sacrifice requisite to “perfection.” His possessions precluded his perfection.
Even so, perfection is the standard enjoined upon us all. “Be ye therefore perfect even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.” Matthew 5:45. The disciples were astonished by this formidably high standard, and asked “Who then can be saved?” Matthew 19:25. “But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.”
Foremost among the gifts of God is mercy. We need it. For even if we do all that God would have us do, we remain unprofitable servants, Luke 17:10--
So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.
God’s grace and mercy is a vital part of the perfection enjoined upon us. “But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in the mercy of God forever and ever.” Psalm 52:8.
The most compelling question in the Bible is: "Whom do you say that I am?" Matthew 16:15. Jesus' question is far more important than Peter's response to the question. Each of us must answer Christ directly, for ourselves.
"Salvation," unfortunately, cannot be "earned," any more than life, itself, can be earned. It is "the gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8-10.
While men may revile us and do all manner of evil against us, this question remains:
"Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation or distress or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors, through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Romans 8:33-39.
Just like everyone who claims to be a "jew" (Romans 2:17-29) is not, but is a liar, Revelations 3:9, many who claim to be saved, sanctified, and glorified are not either, but are also lying.
Therefore, "Behold, I come quickly, hold that fast that thou hast that no man take thy crown." Rev.3:11.
What is at issue is "the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure, which he has purposed in himself." Ephesians 1:9.
The truth is, while there are many, many formulations, there are only two destinations: "everlasting punishment or life eternal." Matthew 25: 46.
"Whom do you say that I am?" Matt.16:15. Each must answer for himself or herself, "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love..." Ephesians 1:4.
There are three stages of spiritual nutrition. "Milk" (I Peter 2:2) and "strong meat", (Heb. 5:14) are commonly addressed.
Herein, I focus upon the too-often-missed first stage: colostrum.
The "colostrum" stage, which is the pre-milk stage, http://www.answers.com/topic/colostrum consisting of water, vitamins, antibodies, and proteins, essential to a child's early, foundational development: "Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it." Proverbs 22:6. A new-born child, like a born-again Christian, must be fortified, with colostrum, its mother's pre-milk before being fed her actual milk.
Therefore "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom, he may devour." (1 Pet. 5:8)
This primary, pragmatic stage can be easily overlooked, by unsuspecting parents, weakening the immunity system of the spiritual and physical babe, increasing its vulnerability to evil germs, and to evil incarnate. Vigilance must begin, in fact, before the child's birth as Rev.12:1-5, attests:
1And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
2And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
3And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
4And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
5And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
I was a breast-fed baby, at least, initially, according to my mother. But, eventually my feedings became too painful for her, so she switched me to a glass bottle. In due course, she told me, I threw the bottle across the room and broke it. But, before I switched to the bottle, however, my body was fortified through Momma’s colostrum.
As with breast feeding, so, it was with the church and the word of God. I was fortified and sanctified from the womb in the redeeming gospel of Jesus Christ. “For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” Gal. 1:12 Therefore, whenever the devil arises, in whatever guise, I see him and am able to withstand and resist him, through the grace of God. Praise God!
Seeing, withstanding and resisting evil are my reasons for being.
Extemporaneous musings, occasionally poetic, about life in its richly varied dimensions, especially as relates to history, theology, law, literature, science, by one who is an attorney, ordained minister, historian, writer, and African American.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Monday, October 25, 2010
AFGHANISTAN'S EERIE ECHOES
AFGHANISTAN’S EERIE ECHOES
Friday, October 9, 2009
By Larry Delano Coleman Esq.
Afghanistan is the belly-button of Asia. http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/places/countries/country_afghanistan.html
It is surrounded by the ancient Persians (Iran), the ancient Slavs (Indo-Europeans), the ancient Mongols (China), and ancient “Indians” (Pakistan). Then, too, “Afghanistan” boasts its own antiquity; it melded all of these forces under the spiritual influence of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and others. http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=ancienthistory&cdn=education&tm=107&gps=106_212_806_357&f=00&tt=14&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/kush/hd_kush.htm
This land of 30 million Sunni and Shiite Muslims is known as “the grave yard of empires.” It represents a conundrum for American military might. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4lXzptzWTg.
Afghanistan is not really a “country.” It is a biomass whose improbable life is leeched from its strategic geography along trade routes, inaccessible mountainous redoubts, virulent, recombinant and militant tribalism (Pashto, Afghan Persian (Dari), Uzbek, Turkmen, 30 minor languages) and entrenched opium trade. http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=ancienthistory&cdn=education&tm=26&gps=67_69_806_357&f=00&tt=14&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.fsmitha.com/h1/map13al.htm
It is an impoverished nation whose gross domestic product is approximately $700 per person, whose life expectancy is 46 years, and whose literacy rate is only about 36% of the population. http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/places/maps/map_country_afghanistan.html
“Jinn” -like are the people of Afghanistan, who have repelled all invaders, including Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, the British, the Russians, and now the Americans and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), it would appear. Their warlike tenacity and perseverance is legendary, mythical.
“In Islamic theology jinn are said to be creatures with free will, made from 'smokeless fire' by Allah in the same way humans were made of earth.[10] According to the Qur'an, Jinn have free will, and Iblis used this freedom in front of Allah by refusing to bow to Adam when Allah told Iblis to do so. By disobeying Allah, he was thrown out of Paradise and called “Shaitan”. Jinn are frequently mentioned in the Qur'an, Sura 72 of the Qur'an (named Al-Jinn) is entirely about them. Another Sura (Al-Nas) mentions Jinn in the last verse.[11] The Qur’an also mentions that Muhammad was sent as a prophet to both “humanity and the Djinn”.[12][13]
Similar to humans, jinn have free will allowing them to follow any religion they choose. They are usually invisible to humans and humans do not appear clear to them. However, jinn often harass and even possess humans, for various reasons, such as romantic infatuation, revenge, or because of a deal made with a practitioner of black magic. Jinns have the power to travel large distances extremely quickly and live in remote areas, mountains, seas, trees, and the air, in their own communities. Like humans, jinns will also be judged on the Day of Judgment and will be sent to Heaven or Hell according to their deeds.” [14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie
The Muslim holy book, the Quran provides in Surah 51:56-59:
051.056
YUSUFALI: I have only created Jinns and men, that they may serve Me.
PICKTHAL: I created the jinn and humankind only that they might worship Me.
SHAKIR: And I have not created the jinn and the men except that they should serve Me.
051.057
YUSUFALI: No Sustenance do I require of them, nor do I require that they should feed Me.
PICKTHAL: I seek no livelihood from them, nor do I ask that they should feed Me.
SHAKIR: I do not desire from them any sustenance and I do not desire that they should feed Me.
051.058
YUSUFALI: For Allah is He Who gives (all) Sustenance,- Lord of Power,- Steadfast (for ever).
PICKTHAL: Lo! Allah! He it is that giveth livelihood, the Lord of unbreakable might.
SHAKIR: Surely Allah is the Bestower of sustenance, the Lord of Power, the Strong.
051.059
YUSUFALI: For the Wrong-doers, their portion is like unto the portion of their fellows (of earlier generations): then let them not ask Me to hasten (that portion)!
PICKTHAL: And lo! for those who (now) do wrong there is an evil day like unto the evil day (which came for) their likes (of old); so let them not ask Me to hasten on (that day).
SHAKIR: So surely those who are unjust shall have a portion like the portion of their companions, therefore let them not ask Me to hasten on.
On December 1, 2009, when President Barack Obama announced an increase of 30,000 additional U.S. troops, for the subjugation of Afghanistan, I marveled that a brilliant black man who ran and was elected on a historic platform of “change we can believe in,” would acquiescence in, and, even raise the stakes upon, a course of conduct so fraught with futility.
How does one battle jinn, much less defeat them? And, supposing that we “win,” whatever that is, what have we won, worth having? Rocks, opium poppies? More important, how do we hold it, the rocks and the opium poppies of Afghanistan, for how long, to what end, and at what cost? Scott Ritter, a foreign policy expert and military intelligence officer, has raised similar concerns, in “McChrystal Doesn‘t Get It--Does Obama?” written in November 2009. http://dprogram.net/2009/11/02/mcchrystal-doesn%E2%80%99t-get-it-does-obama-scott-ritter/
It would appear that our brilliant young black president has been bewitched, if not beguiled, into making such a catastrophic decision in the midst of an economic crisis, diverting additional billions away from a domestic program too long deliberately deferred by domestic demons intent upon dominance.
In that respect, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said regarding the connection between militarism and the alleviation of domestic poverty, in his Riverside Church address in New York on April 4, 1967, entitled “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence.”
Since I am a preacher by trade, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor -- both black and white -- through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam and I watched the program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.
Perhaps the more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of the population. We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html
What was true for Vietnam is perversely and conversely true for Afghanistan. Dr. King’s prophesy still rings true. Attempts to equate President Barack Obama, with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and to conflate their legacies are vainly driven by illusionists and t-shirt marketers, being well off the mark. Dr. King was a prophet. President Obama is a “politician,” just like his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright said at his, now infamous, National Press Club appearance:
MODERATOR: What is your motivation for characterizing Senator Obama's response to you as, quote, "what a politician had to say"? What do you mean by that?
WRIGHT: What I mean is what several of my white friends and several of my white, Jewish friends have written me and said to me. They've said, "You're a Christian. You understand forgiveness. We both know that, if Senator Obama did not say what he said, he would never get elected."
Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls, Huffington, whoever's doing the polls. Preachers say what they say because they're pastors. They have a different person to whom they're accountable.
As I said, whether he gets elected or not, I'm still going to have to be answerable to God November 5th and January 21st. That's what I mean. I do what pastors do. He does what politicians do.
I am not running for office. I am hoping to be vice president.
(LAUGHTER) http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2008/04/28/transcript-rev-wright-at-the-national-press-club/; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2H1dMbkYa4
Being a politician, President Obama has fallen sway to the powers and forces of the military industrial complex of which President Dwight Eisenhower warned as he left office:
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or, indeed, by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States corporations.
Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual --is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Unless ancient history reverse its inexorable course, which I doubt, the eerie echoes of Afghanistan will din into us the painful lessons taught former would-be conquerors of this dusty, distant, desiccated and denuded land: Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, the United Kingdom, the former Soviet Union: “Welcome to the Graveyard of Empires, United States and NATO!”
Saudi Arabians, Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, perhaps, jinn themselves, are smokeless and invisible, except to other jinn in this desolate, mystical non-country now known as Afghanistan. Leave them to the tender mercy of the indigenous Taliban of Afghanistan and Pakistan. They, like other non-Pashtun invaders, will sooner or later get the boot from these bellicose, Islamic avatars who abhor literacy, modernity, science and women’s rights.
#30
Friday, October 9, 2009
By Larry Delano Coleman Esq.
Afghanistan is the belly-button of Asia. http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/places/countries/country_afghanistan.html
It is surrounded by the ancient Persians (Iran), the ancient Slavs (Indo-Europeans), the ancient Mongols (China), and ancient “Indians” (Pakistan). Then, too, “Afghanistan” boasts its own antiquity; it melded all of these forces under the spiritual influence of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and others. http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=ancienthistory&cdn=education&tm=107&gps=106_212_806_357&f=00&tt=14&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/kush/hd_kush.htm
This land of 30 million Sunni and Shiite Muslims is known as “the grave yard of empires.” It represents a conundrum for American military might. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4lXzptzWTg.
Afghanistan is not really a “country.” It is a biomass whose improbable life is leeched from its strategic geography along trade routes, inaccessible mountainous redoubts, virulent, recombinant and militant tribalism (Pashto, Afghan Persian (Dari), Uzbek, Turkmen, 30 minor languages) and entrenched opium trade. http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=ancienthistory&cdn=education&tm=26&gps=67_69_806_357&f=00&tt=14&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.fsmitha.com/h1/map13al.htm
It is an impoverished nation whose gross domestic product is approximately $700 per person, whose life expectancy is 46 years, and whose literacy rate is only about 36% of the population. http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/places/maps/map_country_afghanistan.html
“Jinn” -like are the people of Afghanistan, who have repelled all invaders, including Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, the British, the Russians, and now the Americans and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), it would appear. Their warlike tenacity and perseverance is legendary, mythical.
“In Islamic theology jinn are said to be creatures with free will, made from 'smokeless fire' by Allah in the same way humans were made of earth.[10] According to the Qur'an, Jinn have free will, and Iblis used this freedom in front of Allah by refusing to bow to Adam when Allah told Iblis to do so. By disobeying Allah, he was thrown out of Paradise and called “Shaitan”. Jinn are frequently mentioned in the Qur'an, Sura 72 of the Qur'an (named Al-Jinn) is entirely about them. Another Sura (Al-Nas) mentions Jinn in the last verse.[11] The Qur’an also mentions that Muhammad was sent as a prophet to both “humanity and the Djinn”.[12][13]
Similar to humans, jinn have free will allowing them to follow any religion they choose. They are usually invisible to humans and humans do not appear clear to them. However, jinn often harass and even possess humans, for various reasons, such as romantic infatuation, revenge, or because of a deal made with a practitioner of black magic. Jinns have the power to travel large distances extremely quickly and live in remote areas, mountains, seas, trees, and the air, in their own communities. Like humans, jinns will also be judged on the Day of Judgment and will be sent to Heaven or Hell according to their deeds.” [14] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genie
The Muslim holy book, the Quran provides in Surah 51:56-59:
051.056
YUSUFALI: I have only created Jinns and men, that they may serve Me.
PICKTHAL: I created the jinn and humankind only that they might worship Me.
SHAKIR: And I have not created the jinn and the men except that they should serve Me.
051.057
YUSUFALI: No Sustenance do I require of them, nor do I require that they should feed Me.
PICKTHAL: I seek no livelihood from them, nor do I ask that they should feed Me.
SHAKIR: I do not desire from them any sustenance and I do not desire that they should feed Me.
051.058
YUSUFALI: For Allah is He Who gives (all) Sustenance,- Lord of Power,- Steadfast (for ever).
PICKTHAL: Lo! Allah! He it is that giveth livelihood, the Lord of unbreakable might.
SHAKIR: Surely Allah is the Bestower of sustenance, the Lord of Power, the Strong.
051.059
YUSUFALI: For the Wrong-doers, their portion is like unto the portion of their fellows (of earlier generations): then let them not ask Me to hasten (that portion)!
PICKTHAL: And lo! for those who (now) do wrong there is an evil day like unto the evil day (which came for) their likes (of old); so let them not ask Me to hasten on (that day).
SHAKIR: So surely those who are unjust shall have a portion like the portion of their companions, therefore let them not ask Me to hasten on.
On December 1, 2009, when President Barack Obama announced an increase of 30,000 additional U.S. troops, for the subjugation of Afghanistan, I marveled that a brilliant black man who ran and was elected on a historic platform of “change we can believe in,” would acquiescence in, and, even raise the stakes upon, a course of conduct so fraught with futility.
How does one battle jinn, much less defeat them? And, supposing that we “win,” whatever that is, what have we won, worth having? Rocks, opium poppies? More important, how do we hold it, the rocks and the opium poppies of Afghanistan, for how long, to what end, and at what cost? Scott Ritter, a foreign policy expert and military intelligence officer, has raised similar concerns, in “McChrystal Doesn‘t Get It--Does Obama?” written in November 2009. http://dprogram.net/2009/11/02/mcchrystal-doesn%E2%80%99t-get-it-does-obama-scott-ritter/
It would appear that our brilliant young black president has been bewitched, if not beguiled, into making such a catastrophic decision in the midst of an economic crisis, diverting additional billions away from a domestic program too long deliberately deferred by domestic demons intent upon dominance.
In that respect, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said regarding the connection between militarism and the alleviation of domestic poverty, in his Riverside Church address in New York on April 4, 1967, entitled “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence.”
Since I am a preacher by trade, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor -- both black and white -- through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam and I watched the program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such.
Perhaps the more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of the population. We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/058.html
What was true for Vietnam is perversely and conversely true for Afghanistan. Dr. King’s prophesy still rings true. Attempts to equate President Barack Obama, with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and to conflate their legacies are vainly driven by illusionists and t-shirt marketers, being well off the mark. Dr. King was a prophet. President Obama is a “politician,” just like his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright said at his, now infamous, National Press Club appearance:
MODERATOR: What is your motivation for characterizing Senator Obama's response to you as, quote, "what a politician had to say"? What do you mean by that?
WRIGHT: What I mean is what several of my white friends and several of my white, Jewish friends have written me and said to me. They've said, "You're a Christian. You understand forgiveness. We both know that, if Senator Obama did not say what he said, he would never get elected."
Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls, Huffington, whoever's doing the polls. Preachers say what they say because they're pastors. They have a different person to whom they're accountable.
As I said, whether he gets elected or not, I'm still going to have to be answerable to God November 5th and January 21st. That's what I mean. I do what pastors do. He does what politicians do.
I am not running for office. I am hoping to be vice president.
(LAUGHTER) http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2008/04/28/transcript-rev-wright-at-the-national-press-club/; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2H1dMbkYa4
Being a politician, President Obama has fallen sway to the powers and forces of the military industrial complex of which President Dwight Eisenhower warned as he left office:
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or, indeed, by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States corporations.
Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual --is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central, it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Unless ancient history reverse its inexorable course, which I doubt, the eerie echoes of Afghanistan will din into us the painful lessons taught former would-be conquerors of this dusty, distant, desiccated and denuded land: Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, the United Kingdom, the former Soviet Union: “Welcome to the Graveyard of Empires, United States and NATO!”
Saudi Arabians, Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, perhaps, jinn themselves, are smokeless and invisible, except to other jinn in this desolate, mystical non-country now known as Afghanistan. Leave them to the tender mercy of the indigenous Taliban of Afghanistan and Pakistan. They, like other non-Pashtun invaders, will sooner or later get the boot from these bellicose, Islamic avatars who abhor literacy, modernity, science and women’s rights.
#30